Loading...
IMPORTANT :: YOU MUST SAVE THE FILE AS ".FLV"
Change the file name from "get_video" to "video.flv"
October 2, 2008, U.S. House of Representatives. Congressman Brad Sherman [D-CA] asks:
"But why are we bailing out the Bank of China? Why are we bailing out the Saudi royal family?...
The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere...
A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''
________________________________________
Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6KRXnYgu5I
Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [2]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55lOhYw8Lxk
Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [3]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SHFUa4SpPBU
Sherman's speech on the 1st proposal (or 2nd if you count the proposal published on Sept 20th) of the Bailout bill (September 29th 2008): Best on Bailout Day
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXGv6qSwuPs
Alex Jones interviews Brad Sherman
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26w
Sherman's Blue Paper on the Bailout
http://bradsherman.house.gov/081001comprehensive_article.pdf
171 Heroes vs 263 Traitors
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2008-681
Paul Craig Roberts: It takes the trouble off the banks and puts it on the taxpayers
http://youtube.com/watch?v=PLbWau3rsag&NR=1
________________________________________
CONFUSION WITH CONGRESSIONAL MARTIAL LAW
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi declared -congressional martial law- on Sept 27, 2008. Which is a procedural blanket that removes the rule requiring at least one day between the time a Bill is introduced in the House and the day a vote is taken.
Listen to congressman Michael Burgess [R-TX] addressing congressional martial law on Sept 28: "I understand we're under martial law as declared by the Speaker last night."
http://youtube.com/watch?v=l7B4laX1E70
Read the BLANKET MARTIAL LAW RULE THROUGH MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 29TH
http://rules-republicans.house.gov/ShortTopics/Read.aspx?id=220
That IS NOT the Martial Law that Brad sherman was referring to.
Brad Sherman was specifically referring to Martial Law IN AMERICA, IN THE NEAR FUTURE, not the Sept 27-29 procedural blanket.
Sherman would later confirm the nature of the threat (a National Emergency) on the Alex Jones show.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=egXhZMaY26w
________________________________________
TRANSCRIPT
I thank the Chair. I have got 30 minutes, and I will share some with the gentlelady from Ohio in just a second to describe the flaws with this bill. Believe it or not, 30 minutes is not long enough. But first I want to mention about the calls that are coming into our office.
The calls used to be from people around the country. Now Wall Street firms have their employees unplugging those headsets to call investors and instead calling Members of Congress. So now the calls coming in to at least my office have shifted from 20-1 against this bailout package for Wall Street, down to about 3-1 or 4-1 against this bailout.
I ask my colleagues not to be confused. Edit out some of those calls that are coming to you from folks who are being paid to make the call, and you will realize the country remains absolutely overwhelmingly opposed to this Wall Street bailout bill.
I thank again the gentleman from Ohio, and I will make a few more points.
We had a meeting of the Skeptics Caucus, which is now a bipartisan Skeptics Caucus, where we heard from Bill Isaac. Mr. Isaac was Chair of the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), having first been appointed to that board by President Carter and then appointed by Reagan. You don't find very many people who have support on both sides of the aisle like that.
(...)
[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902074 ]
The only way they can pass this bill is by creating and by sustaining a panic atmosphere.
That atmosphere is not justified. Many of us were told in private conversations, if we voted against this bill, that, on Monday, the sky would fall and that the market would drop 2,000 or 3,000 points the first day and another 2,000 the second day.
A few Members were even told that there would be martial law in America if we voted ``no.''
[ http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8902076 ]
Tags:
Comments to “Congressman Brad Sherman: Martial Law if We Voted No [1]”
Leave a Reply
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, January 7th, 2009 at and is filed under Videos.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
January 7th, 2009 at 16:14:43 Thank you for posting this and allowing comments too. I pray daily for Mercy for USA. Zionist banksters are the real criminals & do not have Christians best interest at heart. Zionists control White House, Congress, Supreme Court, Pentagon, & media. Christians I have known all my life now think Zionist control of USA is a good thing & reject Christ. American & Vatican unqualified support for Israel with silence, money, weapons, ammo, & technology will be to the detriment of World. Peace
January 7th, 2009 at 16:37:42 Too bad ther'll be martial law anyway... just maybe a bit later.
January 7th, 2009 at 17:00:41 Brad Sherman, Kucinich, and Ron Paul are the best we have in our congress.
January 7th, 2009 at 17:23:40 thank you Brad Sherman--when will the bailout scam end?
January 7th, 2009 at 17:46:39 there is not one reason for the rich republican, bohmeian grove people like they did in fallujah, it is of the devil
January 7th, 2009 at 18:09:38 I love it when people buy into the "blame the poor" theory put out by the same right wing that has been exploiting the poor. With overpriced credit and rapacious bankers selling and reselling ad infinitum worthless paper (for hefty commissions each time) the poor and the middle class have born the brunt of this "crisis". You can't expansively enrich wealthy lenders with interest rates that were criminal before the banks had interest deregulated, and expect anything but collapsing markets.
January 7th, 2009 at 18:32:37 Brittani731 I find myself asking the same question actually.How can alledged intelligent people not question these things.I think that they are locked into the system.They only watch the mainstream news and that is part of that system.You really do need to research these things.Unfortunately most people devote their spare time to basically watching rubbish tv programmes and the propaganda news channels.
January 7th, 2009 at 18:55:36 The illuminazis agenda is out in the open .. The people are awakening and peace shall fall upon the world . I wish you well all Amercans who have choosen awareness over Tyranny. May your God Bless you
January 7th, 2009 at 19:18:35 I don't think that is contradictory. There is a difference between bailing out foreign investors at the expense of US taxpayers and stabalizing our markets so that foreign investors have the confidence to invest going forward. The solution to this situation needs to be proactive and preventive, rather than just compensatory.
January 7th, 2009 at 19:41:34 You rock Congressman Brad Sherman!
January 7th, 2009 at 20:04:33 First this representative says we shouldn't be bailing out foreign investors, then 2 minutes later he says we want to get u.s. banks to start lending to each other so foreign investors will be more willing to invest in our markets? Isn't that contradictory, or at least dishonest?
January 7th, 2009 at 20:27:32 American Militias Forming and Growing: Pass Along! watch?v=1oAy_U7DaqA
January 7th, 2009 at 20:50:31 We know that. If you wanted to get rid of every mason on earth, there will be professionals who will be gotten rid of. While I don't see any evidence of Ron Paul being evil, it's always good to know. How do you know that John McCain is not a mason? Many others have secret backgrounds and are clearly evil.
January 7th, 2009 at 21:13:30 Agree, the problem is pyramidal, most of the people want and vote for a kleptomanic, inflationary elite which we call governmnent for lack of a better name. The Welfare-Warfare State. "In general, despite all the talk about freedom, peoples and governments demand unlimited state power internally... People no longer believe in principles, but from time to time they do believe in saviors" (The Age of Revolution - Jacob Burckhardt, Judgments on History and Historians) Thanks for the link!
January 7th, 2009 at 21:36:29 Me thinks the US of A is headed the same way Argentina went, see the documentary attached below. Btw., the problems over there started with a cleptomanic government robbing the people .... watch?v=rH6_i8zuffs
January 7th, 2009 at 21:59:28 Freemasons are like every other lodge, a bunch of guys that work for charity, and drink..a lot. there use to be something creepy about the organization but it is no different then Ralf Cramdon's raccoon club from the honeymooners. Ron Paul said 4 years ago that this economic crisis would happen, he even said the right way to approach this, everyone voted in the opposite direction. I am not a freemason, I do not like joining anything that makes you take oaths. I just know someone who is.
January 7th, 2009 at 22:22:27 This is just one of many "Generated Crises" There will be another one probably around January 21 or 22 2009. The republicans are trying to shut down freedom through false flags and fear and the democrats are trying to shut down freedom through the Clower-Priven strategy which Obama is closely associated with. Vote OUTSIDE THE BOX!!! Find a constitution loving candidate you like and lets swing the election in an astonishing way!! Viva la Freedom!!!!!!!
January 7th, 2009 at 22:45:26 Wat is the opposite of progress?
January 7th, 2009 at 23:08:25 Ron Paul- 33rd degree freemason, just like the rest of these criminals.
January 7th, 2009 at 23:31:24 Welcome to the NWO. Fascist Nazi America.
January 8th, 2009 at 23:54:23 NO. Sherman is not addressing congressional Martial Law, declared on Sept 27 [BLANKET MARTIAL LAW RULE THROUGH MONDAY, SEPT 29TH], the one Michael Burgess [R-TX] was speaking about on Sept 28: "I understand we're under martial law as declared by the Speaker last night." Sherman is specifically referring to Martial Law IN AMERICA, IN THE NEAR FUTURE, not the Sept 27-29 procedural blanket. Sherman would later confirm the nature of the threat (a National Emergency) on the Alex Jones show.
January 8th, 2009 at 00:17:22 Guys, the "martial law" they are referring to CONGRESSIONAL martial law- not the same thing as public martial law. There is rule that requires at least one day between Congress being introduced into law before they vote- Congressional martial law means that time period is removed and Congress must vote without time to peruse the docs/bills. Still wrong, still bullshit- still but this is what that was referring to, not martial law of the citizens. (yet)
January 8th, 2009 at 00:40:21 see:Naomi Wolf author of "Give Me Liberty: A Handbook for American Revolutionaries"
January 8th, 2009 at 01:03:20 ALL troops will not follow along with this shit. Our troops are fighting overseas because of their love for their country, America. They will end up fighting and rioting amongst eachother. It will be the freedom-fighting troops vs. the police state pussies.
January 8th, 2009 at 01:26:19 International Bankers watch?v=YjVD1s0BamQ watch?v=qYlyuHfHX8Y watch?v=WvT4y2vBXzk